Saturday, 11 July 2026

De mortuis

 

De mortuis

When a person dies who is a well-known personality and has spent much time in the public eye, it is commonplace for remarks to be made. Supporters of the dead person will say pleasant things, while those who disliked the person, their principles or their values may find their feelings so enlivened or enraged that they will make egregious comments.

Ann Widdecombe, a strong-willed and outspoken UK politician, was murdered in her home two days ago. Already the knives are out in some quarters. That is despicable, for, as some would say, ‘She’s not even cold in her grave yet.’

‘Do not speak ill of the dead’ is a cautionary advice. It suggests that respect should be given to all, certainly immediately after death, for the dead person cannot defend him or herself. It is also intended to try to ensure that surviving family and friends are spared yet more pain and grief following the death of a loved one.

When a decent interval has passed, however that may be defined, criticism may be expressed.

Everyone has been born human, with all the frailty and ill-judgements we all can exhibit. Everyone is a son or daughter, perhaps with friends to admire and love us. Some will arouse dislike, disapproval, contempt, even hatred, maybe without justification, but the caution remains.

The aphorism is a loose translation of the Latin ‘de mortuis nil nisi bonum dicendum est’ which originated with the 6th century Greek philosopher, Chilon of Sparta, one of the Seven Sages of Ancient Greece.

44 comments:

  1. I frequently see stories online about famous people who have died and it amazes me the cruel things people can say. I don't care how much I dislike a person, I cannot see how people can rejoice in their death.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Too many people fell they can share their opinions, social media makes it so easy, I live by the saying, if you can't say anything nice then don't say anything.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I will say there is at least one person on the planet who deserves every disgraceful thing to be said about him upon his passing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure much will be said, and with great feeling, but the fact remains that the person is loved and respected by his family and friends, and the time for harsh remarks should wait until after the funeral at least. Pol Pot, Ayatollah Khamenei, Adolf Hitler were all despicable, cruel characters, but someone loved them and mourned their passing.

      Delete
  4. Tragic way to die. Here the same saying, do not speak ill of the dead. After all, they are now gone forever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She was a divisive character, but nonetheless was loved and respected by many who will today be grieving.

      Delete
  5. There is one death that I am looking forward to. But I may possibly keep myself from enthusing publicly. We shall see.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I endorse the principle whole-heartedly and cannot believe the number of individuals who would use not only the principle, but even this post, to denigrate and vilify someone who obviously occupies far too much space in their mind. What's that saying? Sorry, not sorry?

    ReplyDelete
  7. It seems a little fatuous to me to modify one’s expression about a person merely because he or she is dead. Hitler died, Stalin died, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot……and so on. Does the mere fact of their death somehow sanitize their life, even for a moment? Can you imagine a survivor of the gas chambers whose entire family perished saying, “Oh dear, Hitler is dead now. Better not speak ill of him.” To bottle up one’s emotions, or to modify one’s speech artificially, would seem harmful to me. Truth is truth, whether the person is alive or dead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I take your point. Of course they are not sanitised or sanctified by death, but the fact remains that each person has people who will grieve for them, no matter how monstrously they may have behaved to countless others. I don't suggest that criticism or horror may never be expressed, but just that we are all human, and a little pause should be given before character assassination begins.

      Delete
  8. This is such a thoughtful look at a classic piece of wisdom that we seem to lose sight of far too easily nowadays. The speed at which people rush to attack someone on social media the second they pass away is truly disheartening, especially considering the grieving family left behind. You made an excellent point about the dead being completely unable to defend themselves against those sudden attacks. It really makes you pause, think about that original Latin meaning, and realize that exercising a little human decency while the family is in shock should be the bare minimum.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree, it only hurts those left behind, not the person who died. And we have no way to no if the person is telling the truth or not. Just stay home from the funeral or sit quietly
    Yes, sometimes ducks go back to the place they last used, in Florida they beging coupling from January ending in July.. I am fine with them gone, just missing them a lot and waiting to see what God sends next.
    I almost forgot, Jesus told us to Let he who has no sin, throw the first stone.. Humans are born to sin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad your ducks may return.
      Too often we're the ones to cast the first stone.

      Delete
  10. I think that most of us will have been taught "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" and that is especially true when someone dies.
    With regard to the death of Ann Widdecombe, I have read a lot of comments along the lines of "I fundamentally disagreed with all her views, yet I liked her as a person" which gives me hope that British toleration and decency still exists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I have read similar comments. I think, trust that we are fundamentally decent in this country.

      Delete
  11. There are those we must speak ill of, even if they are dead. History is full of these people, from Hitler and Josef Mengele to Pol Pot and others, whose acts resulted in the deaths of many and the suffering of many more. But many others don't quite fit that criteria and for those (including people we personally didn't like but were not truly evil) I would agree with not speaking ill of their deaths.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Evil must never be swept away and history must be accurate. Evil-doers are human, too.

      Delete
  12. Regardless of how someone lived, or what beliefs they lived by, murder is ugly. What I find unusual is that death provokes the expressions of outrage that were somehow not important enough to air while the person lived. It seems to be a reminder to the generally aparhetic that the person HAD lived.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's as though death releases the floodgates of opinion.

      Delete
  13. How sad tbat people are already attacking her legacy.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Originally the idea of not speaking ill of the dead was attached to a belief that the dead could come back to haunt people who spoke ill of them. It wasn't respect, it was fear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure that many cultures still hold that fear.

      Delete
  15. Firstly, this is shocking and tragic. Secondly, your second-to-last paragraph says it so well.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Social media often forgets that behind every headline is a family in shock.
    A little restraint in the days after a death is not weakness--it’s simple decency.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree with Lynn and Precious, it's what my mum always said, along with "he/she is gone, let the hate go too", which makes sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
  18. So true. Hate is corrosive.

    ReplyDelete
  19. From what has been said, it was a terrible death... and my condolences are with Ann Widdecombe's family and friends.

    As has been said in other comments ... if you can't say anything nice then don't say anything!

    All the best Jan

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi Janice - today it sounds more troubling ... just appalling. Hilary

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As the details emerge it becomes more shocking.

      Delete
  21. I don't think I could imagine saying something bad about someone even if I thought they were a terrible person in life! It's sad!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We were all small, innocent babes once.

      Delete
  22. A sad but thoughtful post today and I agree with everything you say.

    ReplyDelete



Thank you for visiting. I love to read your comments and really appreciate you taking the time to respond to posts.

I will always try to repay your visit whenever possible.