Friday 12 July 2024

Burke and Hare

 

Burke and Hare


 William Hare and William Burke

Image courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Human dissection was practised in Greece and Egypt until around 280 B.C., but then fell out of favour for hundreds of years until Leonardo da Vinci awakened interest in the early 16th century, with his anatomical drawings. As more people studied medicine, the demand for more cadavers increased, but relatives wanted their loved ones to be buried, rather than cut up. The answer was to use the bodies of felons not considered worthy of Christian burial.

To this end, a law was passed in 1505 giving the Incorporation of Surgeons and Barbers in Edinburgh the body of one executed criminal a year. Thirty-five years later, a similar law allowed the Companies of Barbers and Surgeons in London four executed criminals per year.

This allowance was insufficient for the growing medical schools, so in Great Britain in 1751, the Murder Act was passed. A person found guilty of murder was to be executed two days after sentencing, unless that day was a Sunday, in which case the execution would be deferred to the following Monday. It stated that the body of a murderer was not to be buried, but rather hanged in chains or else subjected to public dissection. It said, ‘in no case whatsoever the body of any murderer shall be suffered to be buried; unless after such body shall have been dissected and anatomised.’ The aim of the Act was ‘for better preventing the horrid crime of murder.’

Even so, the number of cadavers was insufficient for ongoing research. In Scotland, numbers were low, though there were more crimes than murder that carried the death sentence. In England and Wales, two hundred crimes were punishable by death but a further act, in 1823, removed mandatory death sentences from a long list of crimes and the requirement for more bodies to dissect was ever growing. Medical schools were willing to pay for fresh supplies.

Thus, some enterprising people began exhuming recently buried corpses. Cadavers were not regarded as property so grave robbers were free from the threat of prosecution for theft and were able to sell their spoils to private doctors and medical establishments. The grave robbers became known, ghoulishly, as Resurrection men.

 Graveyard watchtower, Eckford Parish Church, Roxburghshire
Image courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Mortsafes in Logierait Kirkyard, Perth and Kinross
Image courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Families concerned for the safekeeping of their relatives’ remains watched over their graves, erecting watch towers in graveyards, or building a mortsafe of iron over the grave. After six weeks or so, the mortsafe might be removed, as the corpse beneath was no longer of any value for dissection.

Some men went further and were seduced into what was called ‘anatomy murder.’ Fresher bodies commanded higher prices and in Edinburgh, from 1827 to 1828, two Irishmen, William Burke and William Hare, murdered sixteen people and sold their bodies to the anatomist Robert Knox for use in his lectures.

They perfected a method of suffocation which left no damage or marks on the body. They enticed poor and needy citizens to their lodgings and dispatched them quickly, selling them for £7 to £10 each, the equivalent of £953 to £1360 in 2024.

Eventually, greed overwhelmed them, and they became careless, arousing much suspicion when they killed a well-known resident called ‘Daft Jamie,’ an 18-year-old street beggar. Students at Knox’s lecture recognised the body – Jamie had a deformed foot – but Knox quickly removed it and the boy’s head. He escaped conviction for complicity in the murders by pleading ignorance, but it was clear to the general populace that he had full knowledge that the bodies he bought had been murdered by Burke and Hare. His reputation suffered and he removed to London, where he had a medical practice in Hackney.

On Christmas Eve, 1828, Burke and Hare went on trial for the murder of Jamie Wilson. Burke was found guilty and condemned to death by hanging. Hare turned King’s evidence and was released and nothing more is known of him. Burke was hanged in public in Edinburgh on  28th January. 1829 and his body was used for dissection. His skeleton is on display in the Anatomy Museum, University of Edinburgh.

Edinburgh was a leader in anatomical study in Europe in the early 19th century. Apart from murderers, the only other bodies permitted for dissection were from those who had died in prison, had committed suicide or were orphans.

The Murder Act of 1751 was repealed in 1828. The 1832Anatomy Act ended the practice of supplying bodies of executed murderers for dissection and authorised the use of cadavers from the workhouses which remained unclaimed after 48 hours.

In modern times, people may indicate that they wish to donate their bodies for medical research.

34 comments:

  1. at first , reading the title , I thought - Oh good, she has obtained two more dogs".
    well, THAT was some story! I love the ghost cages... the little watch tower- but the two criminals- I don't know, seems unfair that one gets the absolute worst and the other walks .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very unfair, but maybe Hare was accorded rough justice at the hands of the people - who knows?

      Delete
  2. I knew the history of grave digging for anatomy lessons, and I remember Burke and Hare's murders very well. But did people know that Hare, a killer for profit, was forgiven and released to live a normal life?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The people knew and reacted with hostility, but Hare managed to escape and there were no more known sightings.

      Delete
  3. Wow that is interesting. I remember reading about Burke and Hare before but I didn't know one of the bodies was used for dissection. Rather fitting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ironic, really, but rather fitting, as you say.

      Delete
  4. I knew about the grave robbings, but had forgotten about Burke and Hare. I'm happy to leave my body to be dissected and learned from at the local teaching hospital, if it is still in good enough condition when I finally kick the bucket. Hopefully thirty years from now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My parents wanted their bodies to be used, but they weren't. I think there was an oversupply at the time.

      Delete
  5. A gruesome tale. In some of the London cemeteries it is possible to still see the watchtowers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I first heard about them by reading a fictional account way, way back. I wonder if I can find out who wrote it.
    I didn't know about one being released and one dissected afterwards.
    You always find such interesting things to write about

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The full story is much more involved and distressing. It's a great source for drama and art.

      Delete
  7. Burke and Hare and their exploits are of course very familiar to those of us who live in Scotland. I'll admit to smiling when I read the first sentence of Linda Sue's comment. And then fearing that somewhere there are a pair of pit bulls or XL Bullies with just those names...
    Cheers, Gail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I laughed, somewhat nervously, at your comment about pit bulls with those names.

      Delete
  8. My anatomy lecturer in university was from Edinburgh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Edinburgh has a great reputation for medical research. You were honoured.

      Delete
  9. Anatomy murder. I have read that there are still gangs these days that make a "killing" out of selling organs for transplant surgery from unwilling donors.
    When I recently made my Will, I asked to have my body donated for medical research but the Advocate (Solicitor) said that could not be done here as there are no storage facilities to keep me fresh until needed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poor people will always be exploited and it's tragic that it still happens.
      Don't pop off yet, JayCee :-)

      Delete
  10. Yes, my body will be available for medical research. "We have the body of a well nourished man...".
    Grave robbing could be distressing for friends and relatives, but not too much for the dead person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think graves should be desecrated - it's very upsetting for relatives and friends, especially if there's a bigoted reason for it.

      Delete
  11. That post came completely out of left field! However, very interesting (along with the comments). MiL wanted her remains to be donated to science but it seems that science is overwhelmed these days with aging remains. I've signed the thing that says any and all body parts can be recycled if of use to anyone, but the more years I live the more bits get worn out and not much use for anything but shark tucker.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've carried a donor card for years, but doubt that whatever's left of me will be much use to anyone.

      Delete
  12. This information was all new to me. I found your post very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  13. That is fascinating. I had no clue!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sometimes we're better off not knowing.

      Delete
  14. Gruesome but fascinating! I'd seen a grave with a mortsafe when we were visiting a Shropshire graveyard last year, only I'd no idea what it was until I read your post! xxx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've never seen one, so you're one up on me;-)

      Delete
  15. I had read about Burke and Hare in a true crime book several months ago. I did know that, here in the United States, grave robbing was a major problem in the 19th century. I saw a history mystery show that dealt with "grave torpedos". It got so bad that the body of a son of a former U.S. President was stolen in the 1870's. There is an interesting story surrounding the body of President Abraham Lincoln, who was assassinated in 1865. I had not, however, heard of mortsafes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't think grave robbing would be confined to UK, but a President's son - that must have been a vanity project, surely, or more likely a means to extract money from the family. Shameful!

      Delete
  16. A little gruesome but nonetheless an interesting read.

    All the best Jan

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi Janice - after reading about Stubbs and his anatomical studies ... all I can say is - thank goodness for those early people who needed to know more and went to those lengths ... apparently they think Stubbs might not have been able to smell. I remember that after the war our cesspit was drained by a man who's been gassed and couldn't smell ... life has its quirks that's for sure. Interesting post - thank you ... cheers Hilary

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess having a suppressed sense of smell would be very helpful in a pathology lab, but one can become accustomed to anything with practice.

      Delete



Thank you for visiting. I love to read your comments and really appreciate you taking the time to respond to posts.

I will always try to repay your visit whenever possible.